BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//2022 ICON•S Annual Conference - ECPv5.16.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:2022 ICON•S Annual Conference
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://conference.icon-society.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for 2022 ICON•S Annual Conference
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20220706T161500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20220706T174500
DTSTAMP:20260416T174135
CREATED:20220607T115740Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220701T141904Z
UID:4692-1657124100-1657129500@conference.icon-society.org
SUMMARY:Iustitias vestras iudicabo. The boundaries of liberal democratic standard of judiciary
DESCRIPTION:The maxim of iustitias vestras iudicabo (I will judge your justice) is not very oft-quoted in the anglophone world\, quite contrary to the Polish legal tradition. The saying serves as a reminder of an always higher authority: even the judges – the ones who themselves dispense justice – must be responsible for their actions. The God is the implicit enforcer of the admonition – can anyone else have the right to this claim? \nIn the recent years\, the discussion over judges’ appointment and personal responsibility has become embedded in political and legal controversies. The ongoing conflict between some of the EU member states – Hungary and Poland – and the European Commission over the legal reforms changing the structure of judiciary in the said countries is certainly the most salient one\, but by no means unique. These developments go against the established consensus that advocates for an increase of judges’ own role in the governance of judicial power. Constitutional reforms in the UK and France are one of the most important examples of the growing power of the judiciary. In both cases\, the traditional principles of parliamentary supremacy and of the indivisible popular sovereignty are being circumscribed. \nIn our forum\, we would like to debate some of the key problems related to judicial appointments. We are asking ourselves two fundamental questions: first\, how judges should be chosen to maintain democratic and liberal standards (the formal problem); second\, to what extent judges may set themselves to be guardians/setters of democratic and liberal standards (the material problem).
URL:https://conference.icon-society.org/event/iustitias-vestras-iudicabo-the-boundaries-of-liberal-democratic-standard-of-judiciary/
LOCATION:Building D\, Faculty of Law\, Administration and Economics\, Uniwersytecka 7–10 Street\, Wrocław\, 50–145
CATEGORIES:Interest Groups and Fora
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://conference.icon-society.org/wp-content/uploads/Forum3.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Host%203%20%5Bzoom3%5D":MAILTO:zoom3@icon-society.org
GEO:51.113209393101;17.034422106224
X-APPLE-STRUCTURED-LOCATION;VALUE=URI;X-ADDRESS=Building D Faculty of Law Administration and Economics Uniwersytecka 7–10 Street Wrocław 50–145;X-APPLE-RADIUS=500;X-TITLE=Faculty of Law\, Administration and Economics\, Uniwersytecka 7–10 Street:geo:17.034422106224,51.113209393101
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR