BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//2022 ICON•S Annual Conference - ECPv5.16.2//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:2022 ICON•S Annual Conference
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://conference.icon-society.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for 2022 ICON•S Annual Conference
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20220327T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20221030T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20220706T161500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20220706T174500
DTSTAMP:20260407T190419
CREATED:20220607T095650Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220701T141859Z
UID:4662-1657124100-1657129500@conference.icon-society.org
SUMMARY:Informal Judicial Institutions
DESCRIPTION:Mainstream literature in law focuses on formal rules. Yet informal institutions – unwritten rules\, practices and narratives that are created and enforced outside officially sanctioned channels – are just as important. Some informal institutions\, ranging from bureaucratic norms to clientelism and corruption\, may facilitate democratic decay or authoritarian consolidation. For example\, various “gentlemen’s pacts” between judicial associations may substitute formal rules governing selection and promotion of judges\, entrenching patronage\, nepotism and vertical gender segregation. Other informal institutions may counteract democratic decay. For instance\, judges may team up with journalists and mobilize the public to defend the judiciary. Informality can thus be a force for the good or the bad. The key question is then what informal institutions and under what conditions they push institutional performance in one direction or the other.\nThe goal of this working group is to examine how informal institutions affect functioning of the state and under what circumstances they counteract or contribute to democratic decay. We will build on a comparative legal perspective combined with sociological and political science approaches. Provisionally\, we would like to focus on three aims: \n\nto identify the most important informal institutions in different countries and develop their typology;\n to assess their interaction with formal institutions and their impact\, positive or negative\, on the functioning of the state;\n to analyse the dynamics of informal institutions\, that is how they reproduce themselves and under what circumstances they change.
URL:https://conference.icon-society.org/event/informal-judicial-institutions/
CATEGORIES:Interest Groups and Fora
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://conference.icon-society.org/wp-content/uploads/220602_ICON-S-2022–Onsite-Panel-Pix-Master131.png
ORGANIZER;CN="Host%2011%20%5Bzoom11%5D":MAILTO:zoom11@icon-society.org
LOCATION:https://conference.icon-society.org/event/informal-judicial-institutions/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR